Blogs & UpdatesArticle

Legal Basis for Government's Advisory on Generative AI Models Questioned by Experts

Legal Basis for Government's Advisory on Generative AI Models Questioned by Experts

Generative AI: Concerns Over Government Advisory

Technology lawyers have raised doubts about the recent government advisory requiring companies to seek permission before launching Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models. According to experts, the advisory lacks a solid legal foundation and raises concerns about enforcement competence.

Ranjana Adhikari, a partner at IndusLaw, highlighted the ambiguity surrounding the advisory's statutory basis and enforcement mechanisms. She emphasized that terms like "bias" and "unreliability" remain undefined, making compliance challenging even for well-intentioned companies.

While IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw clarified that the advisory isn't legally binding, lawyer and tech policy advisor Dhruv Garg emphasized the need for comprehensive legislative processes with clear definitions and obligations for effective AI regulation.

Aaron Solomon, managing partner at Solomon & Co, pointed out discrepancies regarding intermediary exemptions under the IT Act, suggesting that AI technologies like ChatGPT and Perplexity AI may not fall under traditional intermediary definitions.

Amidst the debate, People+ai, an initiative by EkStep Foundation, seeks input from India's AI community and startup ecosystem to shape future regulations. The initiative aims to address concerns and aspirations regarding responsible AI development and deployment.

Aakrit Vaish, CEO of Haptik, highlighted the pressing questions surrounding the advisory's applicability and the submission requirements for AI models. He emphasized the need for clarity from MeitY officials regarding regulatory frameworks.

As discussions continue, stakeholders await further clarity from policymakers and regulatory bodies to ensure balanced AI regulation fostering innovation and societal benefit. While concerns persist, the dialogue between industry players and government entities remains crucial for shaping the future of AI development in India.

*Continue to visit our website for additional articles discussing legal considerations related to emerging technologies. To learn more, feel free to reach out to us via email, chat or directly Book an Appointment.*

Categories:
Civil MattersCyber Laws and PrivacyEnforcementOnline SafetyTechnology Crime
Tags:
AI developmentAI regulationAshwini VaishnawChatGPTGenerative AIGovernment's AdvisoryMeitYPerplexity AItechnology lawyers

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.advritujeph.in, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Ritu Jeph Legal Services of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Ritu Jeph Legal Services or its members.

The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. Ritu Jeph Legal Services shall not be liable for consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Ritu Jeph Legal Services.