Understanding Judicial Precedents: How Indian Courts Create Judge-Made Remedies

Have you ever wondered if all laws in India come only from Parliament? The answer might surprise you. While Parliament creates statutory laws, Indian courts also play a crucial role in developing judge-made remedies that shape our legal landscape. This fascinating concept shows how our justice system remains flexible and responsive to society’s evolving needs.

What Are Statute-Based Laws?

To understand judge-made remedies, we first need to grasp statute-based laws. The Indian Constitution is the supreme source of law, giving authority to both Parliament and courts. Think of the Constitution as the sun in our legal solar system—everything derives its energy and legitimacy from it.

Statute-based laws are formal Acts passed by Parliament or State Legislatures that provide clear, written rules for society. These are the laws we typically think of when we imagine the legal system—concrete, documented regulations that govern various aspects of our lives.

ALSO READ: How to Write an Effective RTI Application in India: 2025 Guide

Recent examples include the three criminal laws enacted in 2023: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). These replaced the older Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and Evidence Act to address modern challenges like cybercrime, organized crime, and digital fraud. Similarly, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 tackles privacy concerns in our increasingly digital age.

These statutes represent Parliament’s attempt to create comprehensive frameworks for regulating society and addressing contemporary issues.

The Birth of Judge-Made Remedies

Here’s the practical challenge: Can Parliament create a separate law for every unexpected situation that might arise? Obviously not. Life is unpredictable and constantly evolving. New situations emerge daily that existing statutes simply cannot anticipate or address. This limitation of legislative lawmaking is where courts step in with their unique and essential power.

Courts don’t merely enforce existing laws—they interpret them, apply them to novel situations, and sometimes create entirely new principles called judge-made remedies. When the Supreme Court or High Courts establish a new legal principle through their judgments, it becomes a precedent. This means lower courts must follow the same reasoning and principles in similar future cases, creating consistency and predictability in the legal system.

This concept, known as judicial precedent, derives its authority from the doctrine of “stare decisis,” a Latin phrase meaning “to stand by things decided.” Article 141 of the Indian Constitution formally recognizes this doctrine, stating that the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within India.

Powerful Examples of Judge-Made Remedies

Judge-made remedies can be as influential and far-reaching as statutory laws themselves. Consider these landmark examples that have fundamentally shaped Indian jurisprudence:

The Basic Structure Doctrine emerged from court judgments, particularly the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), establishing that while Parliament can amend the Constitution, it cannot alter its fundamental framework or basic structure. This includes elements like federalism, secularism, judicial review, and separation of powers. Though not originally written in the Constitution, this doctrine now serves as one of our strongest constitutional safeguards against potential misuse of parliamentary power.

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was another revolutionary court-developed mechanism that transformed access to justice in India. Courts relaxed traditional rules requiring direct personal injury to allow any concerned citizen to approach them for public causes, making justice more accessible to marginalized communities.

Perhaps most notably, the Vishaka Guidelines (1997) addressed workplace sexual harassment when no statute existed to protect women. The Supreme Court created comprehensive guidelines that organizations had to follow, filling a critical legal vacuum. These judge-made remedies later became the foundation for the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act, 2013, passed by Parliament, demonstrating how judicial innovation can inspire legislative action.

Other examples include the right to privacy (recognized as a fundamental right through judicial interpretation), environmental protection principles, and guidelines for police procedures during arrests and interrogations.

Why Judge-Made Remedies Matter

Judge-made remedies demonstrate that our legal system is living and breathing, not frozen in time. They keep laws relevant when social circumstances change faster than legislation can respond. While Parliament meets periodically and may take years to draft, debate, and pass new laws, courts address urgent issues immediately through their judgments.

For law students and legal professionals, this means that studying only statutes is insufficient—court judgments are equally vital because they often update and reinterpret outdated laws, giving them practical relevance in contemporary contexts. Sometimes statutes become obsolete, but judicial interpretation breathes new life into them, making them applicable to modern situations.

ALSO READ: How to Get a Supreme Court Internship – Even If You’re from a Non-NLU

Think of it this way: statutes provide the backbone of our legal system, but judge-made remedies keep it alive, flexible, and aligned with contemporary needs. This dynamic interplay between legislative law and judicial interpretation is what makes Indian jurisprudence both robust and adaptive.

The Living Nature of Law

Laws evolve not just through parliamentary debates but through courtroom battles and judicial wisdom. This unique power of courts to create judge-made remedies ensures our legal system remains a tool for justice, not just a collection of rigid rules written decades ago. It allows the law to respond to technological advances, social changes, and emerging challenges without waiting for legislative action.

This is why jurisprudence—the philosophy and theory of law—considers judicial precedents as an essential source of law alongside statutes. The law is not static; it’s an evolving discipline that grows through both legislative enactments and judicial pronouncements.

So the next time you think about Indian law, remember it’s not confined to dusty law books and parliamentary records. It’s constantly being shaped, refined, and expanded in courtrooms across the country through the power of judge-made remedies.