Should India Reduce the Age of Consent from 18 to 16? Supreme Court Weighs In

The age of consent in India, currently set at 18, is under judicial scrutiny in a landmark Supreme Court case (Nipun Saxena v. Union of India). Senior advocate Indira Jaising, acting as amicus curiae, has urged the court to reduce the age of consent from 18 to 16, arguing that existing laws unjustly criminalize consensual relationships between adolescents. This debate raises crucial questions about adolescent autonomy, legal protections, and the unintended consequences of well-intentioned laws.

What Is Being Argued in Court?

Indira Jaising’s Argument for Lowering the Age of Consent

Jaising contends that today’s adolescents mature earlier and are capable of making informed decisions about relationships. She highlights that before 2013, India’s age of consent was 16 for over 70 years—a threshold changed without public debate and against the Justice Verma Committee’s recommendations.

ALSO READ: Roe v. Wade: The Abortion Case That Changed America

Key points from her argument:

• Rise in POCSO Cases: Between 2017 and 2021, POCSO cases involving 16–18-year-olds surged by 180%, many filed by parents opposing inter-caste or inter-faith relationships.
• Criminalization of Consensual Acts: Teens in consensual relationships face prosecution under stringent child protection laws, often leading to trauma and forced marriages.
• Need for a “Close-in-Age” Exception: Jaising proposes exempting consensual relationships between adolescents (e.g., a 16-year-old and an 18-year-old) from criminal liability.
• Mandatory Reporting Reforms: Current laws require doctors, teachers, and counselors to report underage sexual activity, deterring teens from seeking medical or psychological help.

Government’s Opposition to Changing the Age of Consent

The Union government strongly opposes lowering the age of consent in India, arguing that:

• Child Protection Risks: Reducing the age could weaken safeguards, enabling predators to exploit minors under the guise of “consent.”
• Legislative Consistency: Laws like POCSO, IPC (now BNS), and the Child Marriage Act uniformly treat under-18s as minors, reflecting a deliberate policy.
• Judicial Discretion Preferred: The government suggests case-by-case judicial review rather than a blanket reduction.

Key Data & Social Realities

• Teen Sexual Activity: The National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) reveals that a significant percentage of Indian teens are sexually active, yet all such activity is criminalized if under 18.
• Unintended Consequences: Criminalizing consensual relationships forces young couples into secrecy, early marriages, or legal battles, rather than fostering open dialogue.
• Global Comparisons: Many countries, including the UK, Canada, and Germany, set the age of consent between 14 and 16, often with close-in-age exemptions.

Why This Debate Matters

1. Balancing Protection and Autonomy

Should all under-18 relationships be deemed exploitative, or should adolescents have legal recognition of their consensual choices? The age of consent in India must strike a balance between safeguarding minors and respecting their growing autonomy.

2. POCSO Act’s Scope and Misuse

While POCSO was designed to protect children, its rigid application has led to:

• Parents filing cases to control relationships.
• Teens avoiding medical help due to mandatory reporting.
• Courts burdened with cases involving willing participants.

3. Mental Health and Rights Implications

Fear of legal repercussions prevents adolescents from seeking contraception, counseling, or abortion services, worsening health outcomes.

ALSO READ: Detailed Guide to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: All 51 Orders and Key Sections Explained

Where the Case Stands Now

The Supreme Court is reviewing written submissions, with hearings likely resuming in August 2025. Meanwhile, stakeholders remain divided:

• Rights Groups support reform, citing adolescent rights.
• Child Protection Advocates warn against lowering the age of consent, fearing increased exploitation.

The debate over the age of consent in India reflects a deeper tension between protection and personal freedom. Lowering it to 16 could acknowledge adolescent maturity, but critics argue it may weaken defenses against abuse.

Key Questions Moving Forward:

• Can India adopt a close-in-age exception to prevent misuse?
• Will reforms ensure teens can access healthcare without fear?
• How can laws evolve to protect minors without criminalizing normal adolescent behavior?

As the Supreme Court deliberates, this case could reshape India’s legal approach to youth, consent, and justice.